Protecting your Medical
Freedom and Civil Liberties

America's Frontline Doctors

Issue Briefs

America's Frontline Doctors

Contamination Risk to the Unvaccinated

DNA Contamination of the Pfizer COVID Vaccine

A HEALTH CONCERN FOR THE UNVACCINATED??

AFLDS recently issued an issue brief concerning the lack of regulatory oversight of these gene-transfer vaccines. There are many serious health concerns that result from the application of gene-transfer technology to vaccines. None have been seriously addressed by any regulatory body that we are aware of. An unexpected plot twist to this story is that it now appears that Pfizer may also be criminally negligent in their oversight of the production process for the “vaccines”, thereby creating another whole slew of potential health concerns. 

            The work of Dr. Kevin McKernan demonstrated that the Pfizer vaccines are contaminated with bacterial plasmid DNA. This itself has far-ranging implications, but the primary concern is that these contaminating DNA plasmids may essentially become infective agents. These agents are able to get inside both bacterial and human cells, where they direct production of the toxic, foreign viral spike protein. It also means that Pfizer vaccines are likely contaminated with bacteria endotoxins. [1]

THE POTENTIAL DANGERS

Bacteria are used to grow large amounts of DNA which is then used to produce the mRNA for the Pfizer vaccines.  This DNA is referred to as a plasmid or expression vector DNA and encodes the gene for the spike protein. It also contains several regulatory elements to “turn on” its expression as well as genes for antibiotic resistance. The plasmid DNA is supposed to be extracted from the bacteria and used to make the synthetic mRNA (used for the “vaccine”) in a cell free environment. The mRNA should be extracted and purified before being incorporated into the nano-lipid particles for the vaccine. Except, clearly, it wasn’t. Dr. McKernan’s work showed that 10-30% of the genetic material in some vials of “vaccine” were contaminating bacterial plasmid DNA.[1] If the mRNA was not properly purified and thus contains substantial amounts of bacteria DNA, the “vaccines” likely also contain residue from the bacteria themselves, in the form of bacterial endotoxins. Some of the serious potential health impacts of this contamination are detailed below. 

  1. Contaminating bacterial endotoxins may cause anaphylaxis, severe inflammation and other vaccine injuries. One of the reasons this finding is so shocking is that contamination with bacterial toxins has plagued vaccine manufacture for decades. As it is a known problem, it is reasonable to expect careful oversight of this aspect of the manufacturing process. [2] The presence of endotoxins in a vaccine can cause anaphylaxis, severe inflammation, sepsis, endothelial fragility, bradycardia, hypotension and cardiovascular collapse, and interference with energy production and such dysfunctions as Kawasaki’s Disease.‍  [3] All of these have been reported to VAERS following injection with the Pfizer COVID “vaccine.” [4]
  2. Spike protein may be being produced in the body in both the vaccinated and unvaccinated. Some of the contaminating bacterial DNA (plasmid) was found to be completely intact, rendering it able to enter both bacterial and human cells and potentially produce the spike protein in both cell types. [5] Thus, it is possible that people now have gut bacteria and/or human gut cells which harbor this plasmid DNA and which are making the spike protein. Once this plasmid is present in the bacteria of a person, they will then share their (potentially spike-protein producing) bacteria with everyone they come in contact with and leave some everywhere they visit. Thus, this plasmid DNA has the potential to “infect” both the vaccinated and unvaccinated alike.
  3. Development of antibiotic resistance strains of bacteria in the microbiome. The plasmids used to produce the Pfizer vaccines contain genes for antibiotic resistance (neomycin and kanamycin resistance). [6] Thus, the replication of these plasmids in our gut bacteria may contribute to the development of antibiotic resistance strains of bacteria in the microbiome. 
  4. Plasmid DNA coding for the spike protein can be incorporated into your DNA, potentially causing insertional mutagenesis. Regulatory elements within the plasmid DNA tell it to go to the nucleus of mammalian cells where it has the potential to be integrated into the person’s DNA. [7] If the plasmid inserts in a way that disrupts a key gene, it could cause insertional mutagenesis leading to dysfunction and/or cancer, especially blood cancers, such as leukemia and lymphoma.
  5. Spike protein production may be amplified in people with latent SV40 viral infections. One of the regulatory elements in the plasmid is from the monkey virus, Simian Virus 40 (SV40). Many people are familiar with the SV40 virus because it is a monkey virus that contaminated 10-30% of the original Polio vaccines. [8] This contamination resulted in the spread of SV40 in the population, and now it is estimated that between 1 and 15% of people may be latently infected with SV40.‍ [9] Infected persons will produce the large T antigen protein that “turns on” the SV40 regulatory region, inducing the production of spike protein.  Once made, data suggest that the spike protein may inactivate the body’s key tumor suppressor gene (p53), thereby increasing the risk of cancer. [10] Latent infection with SV40 is also known to increase cancer risk because the large T-antigen also binds and inactivates the tumor suppressor genes p53 and pRB (retinoblastoma protein). This combination may put a small, but significant portion of the population at risk for the development of “turbo cancers.” [11]
  6. Will milk products turn on the production of spike protein in the gut? Another important regulatory region that “turns on” production of the spike protein is the T7 promoter. It is known to be “activated” in the presence of milk products. This raises the question of whether ingesting milk products will cause the gut bacteria who harbor this plasmid to start producing spike protein. ‍[12]

While all of these are significant concerns, at this point they are theoretical. Studies need to be done to assess whether this plasmid is “infecting” the bacteria or cells of our gut lining. However, the important point here is that all of this should NEVER have been a concern in the first place. Pfizer should have done its due diligence in making sure that the production of the vaccine followed industry standards as well as ethical standards. So, now, we add criminal negligence in the production of these “vaccines” to their growing list of crimes against humanity. 

 

Footnotes

  • [1]

    Anandamide (2021, Aug 23) Decentralized Medicine. Retrieved at <a href="https://anandamide.substack.com"target="_blank" class="text-[#0563c1] no-underline hover:underline font-semibold" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://anandamide.substack.com

  • [2]

    Steven M. Opal, Patrick J. Scannon, Jean-Louis Vincent, Mark White, Stephen F. Carroll, John E. Palardy, Nicolas A. Parejo, John P. Pribble, Jon H. Lemke, Relationship between Plasma Levels of Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and LPS-Binding Protein in Patients with Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock, The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Volume 180, Issue 5, November 1999, Pages 1584–1589. Retrieved at  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1086/315093"target="_blank" class="text-[#0563c1] no-underline hover:underline font-semibold" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1086/315093

  • [3]

    Rahmel, T., Marko, B., Nowak, H. et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction in sepsis is associated with diminished intramitochondrial TFAM despite its increased cellular expression. Sci Rep 10, 21029 (2020). Retrieved at <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-78195-4"target="_blank" class="text-[#0563c1] no-underline hover:underline font-semibold"target="_blank" class="text-[#0563c1] no-underline hover:underline font-semibold" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78195-4 <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-78195-4"target="_blank" class="text-[#0563c1] no-underline hover:underline font-semibold"target="_blank" class="text-[#0563c1] no-underline hover:underline font-semibold">https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-78195-4

  • [4]

    Takeshita, S et al. “The role of bacterial lipopolysaccharide-bound neutrophils in the pathogenesis of Kawasaki disease.” The Journal of infectious diseases vol. 179,2 (1999): 508-12. doi:10.1086/314600. Retrieved at <a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9878040/"target="_blank" class="text-[#0563c1] no-underline hover:underline font-semibold">https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9878040/

  • [5]

    Anandamide (2021, Aug 23) Decentralized Medicine. Retrieved at <a href="https://anandamide.substack.com/"target="_blank" class="text-[#0563c1] no-underline hover:underline font-semibold">https://anandamide.substack.com/

  • [6]

    Anandamide (2021, Aug 23) Decentralized Medicine. Retrieved at <a href="https://anandamide.substack.com/"target="_blank" class="text-[#0563c1] no-underline hover:underline font-semibold">https://anandamide.substack.com/

  • [7]

    Prasad, Tekkatte Krishnamurthy, and Nalam Madhusudhana Rao. “The role of plasmid constructs containing the SV40 DNA nuclear-targeting sequence in cationic lipid-mediated DNA delivery.” Cellular & molecular biology letters vol. 10,2 (2005): 203-15. Retrieved at <a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16010286/"target="_blank" class="text-[#0563c1] no-underline hover:underline font-semibold">https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16010286/

  • [8]

    Institute of Medicine (US) Immunization Safety Review Committee. Immunization Safety Review: SV40 Contamination of Polio Vaccine and Cancer. Edited by Kathleen Stratton et. al., National Academies Press (US), 2002. doi:10.17226/10534. Retrieved at <a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25057632/"target="_blank" class="text-[#0563c1] no-underline hover:underline font-semibold">https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25057632/

  • [9]

    Barbanti-Brodano, Giuseppe et al. “Simian virus 40 infection in humans and association with human diseases: results and hypotheses.” Virology vol. 318,1 (2004): 1-9. doi:10.1016/j.virol.2003.09.004. Retrieved at <a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15015494/"target="_blank" class="text-[#0563c1] no-underline hover:underline font-semibold">https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15015494/

  • [10]

    Singh, Nishant, and Anuradha Bharara Singh. “S2 subunit of SARS-nCoV-2 interacts with tumor suppressor protein p53 and BRCA: an in silico study.” Translational oncology vol. 13,10 (2020): 100814. doi:10.1016/j.tranon.2020.100814. Retrieved at .https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32619819/

  • [11]

    Vilchez, Regis A, and Janet S Butel. “Emergent human pathogen simian virus 40 and its role in cancer.” Clinical microbiology reviews vol. 17,3 (2004): 495-508, table of contents. doi:10.1128/CMR.17.3.495-508.2004. Retrieved at <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC452549/"target="_blank" class="text-[#0563c1] no-underline hover:underline font-semibold">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC452549/

  • [12]

    Martini, F et al. “SV40 early region and large T antigen in human brain tumors, peripheral blood cells, and sperm fluids from healthy individuals.” Cancer research vol. 56,20 (1996): 4820-5. Retrieved at <a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8841004"target="_blank" class="text-[#0563c1] no-underline hover:underline font-semibold">https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8841004

Unless we put medical freedom into the Constitution, the time will come when medicine will organize into an undercover dictatorship to restrict the art of healing to one class of Men and deny equal privileges to others; the Constitution of this republic should make special privilege for medical freedom as well as religious freedom."

DR. BENJAMIN RUSH